Picou v. Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc.

Filing 27

AGREED JUDGMENT granting Ore Tenus Motion to Dismiss; all claims dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 6/12/09 (PKM)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI, WESTERN DIVISION BRYAN J. PICOU VS. BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS INC. AND JOHN DOES 1-50 PLAINTIFF NO.: 5:08CV250DCB-JMR DEFENDANTS AGREED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE THIS CAUSE came on to be heard this day on the plaintiff's motion ore tenus seeking leave of Court to dismiss all claims asserted in this cause against all remaining defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Having considered this matter, and noting the parties have agreed to the dismissal of all claims asserted with prejudice, the Court finds the motion is well taken and should be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all claims asserted by plaintiff are hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs. ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED this the 12th day of June , 2009. Submitted by: /s/ Lem E. Montgomery III Lem E. Montgomery III, MB No. 100686 BUTLER, SNOW, O'MARA, STEVENS & CANNADA, PLLC ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS /s/ Todd Waycaster _________________ Todd Waycaster, MB No. 10766 Waycaster Law Offices John D. Moore, MB No. 10610 Law Offices of John D. Moore, P.A. ATTORNEYS FOR BRYAN J. PICOU s/ David Bramlette UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?