Comet Street, Inc. v. Roberts et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice with each party to bear its own costs. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 2/23/10 (PKM)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION COMET STREET, INC. VS. CIVIL ACTION NO.: PLAINTIFF 5:09-cv-137-DCB-JMR KENNETH G. ROBERTS, MELISSA ROBERTS, AND LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANTS ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE THIS DAY this cause came on to be heard on the Motion of Plaintiff, Comet Street, Inc., to dismiss without prejudice all claims filed in this action by the parties, with each party to bear its own costs, as the underlying lawsuit from which this case originates, Kenneth G. Roberts and Melissa Roberts v. Comet Street, Inc.; Civil Action No. 251-06-775CIV; Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi, has been resolved by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company's voluntary payment of a settlement to Kenneth and Melissa Roberts, there remains no issues to litigate before this Court; and the Court being further advised in the premises, finds that the Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice is well taken and should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action be, and the same hereby is, dismissed without prejudice with each party to bear its own costs. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, THIS the 23rd day of February, 2010. s/ David Bramlette UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Submitted by: J. Wade Sweat (MSB #9933) Randall E. Day III (MSB #9722) Marisa C. Atkinson (MSB #101265) COPELAND, COOK, TAYLOR AND BUSH, P.A. 600 Concourse, Suite 100 1076 Highland Colony Parkway (39157) Post Office Box 6020 Ridgeland, Mississippi 39158 Telephone No.: (601) 856-7200 Facsimile No.: (601) 856-7626 Attorneys for Comet Street, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?