Patterson v. Yazoo City, Mississippi et al
Filing
140
ORDER granting 138 Yazoo Recreation Commission's Motion to Supplement its Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 10/11/2011 (PL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
WESTERN DIVISION
HENRY LEWIS PATTERSON, “H.L.”
VERSUS
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-00153-DCB-JMR
YAZOO CITY, MISSISSIPPI;
YAZOO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI; and
YAZOO RECREATION COMMISSION
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Currently before the Court is Defendant Yazoo Recreation
Commission’s Motion to Supplement its Motion for Summary Judgment
[docket entry no. 138].
The Court, having reviewed the said
Motion, finds the allegations therein significant and meritorious
of further briefing. Yazoo Recreation Commission will be given
twenty (20) days from the time this Order is entered to supplement
its Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Plaintiff will be allowed
fourteen days (14) to respond, consistent with Local Rule 7(b)(4).1
Any supplementation should be strictly limited to the issue raised
in Yazoo Recreation Commission’s present Motion.
Further, in light of this recent development, the Court
postpones the hearing scheduled for October 12, 2011 in the United
States Courthouse in Natchez, Mississippi until such time as the
briefing regarding this issue is complete.
Accordingly,
1
Yazoo City will also be permitted to rebut any brief filed
by the Plaintiff pursuant to the same local rule.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement
its Motion for Summary Judgment [docket entry no. 138] is
GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing scheduled for
October 12, 2011 will be POSTPONED and rescheduled once the
briefing on this issue is complete.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the _11TH_ day of October 2011.
/s/ David Bramlette
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?