Lenard et al v. State of Mississippi et al
ORDER denying without prejudice 14 motion for service of process. Plaintiffs may renew their motion in the event this action is allowed to proceed further. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 3/14/2013 (ECW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
WALTER G. LENARD
and RUSELL CHANEY
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-cv-120(DCB)(JMR)
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, et al.
This cause is before the Court on the plaintiffs Walter G.
Lenard and Russell Chaney’s motion for service of process (docket
Inasmuch as a Report and Recommendation was filed on
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994); and inasmuch as dismissal of this
action would moot the plaintiffs’ motion for service of process,
the court finds that the motion should be denied without prejudice
to allow the plaintiffs to renew their motion if their lawsuit is
allowed to proceed further.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiffs Walter G. Lenard and
Russell Chaney’s motion for U.S. Marshall to serve each defendant
(docket entry 14) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
SO ORDERED, this the 14th day of March, 2013.
/s/ David Bramlette
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?