United States et al v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America et al

Filing 183

ORDER finding as moot 121 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 125 Motion for Preliminary Injunction Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 3/25/2014 (ECW)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF MID STATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.; and MID STATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. VS. PLAINTIFFS CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-cv-169(DCB)(JMR) TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA; U.S. COATING SPECIALTIES & SUPPLIES, LLC; and EARL WASHINGTON DEFENDANTS ORDER This cause is before the Court on defendant Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America (“Travelers”)’s Motion for Summary Judgment against Mid State Construction Company, Inc. (“Mid State”), U.S. Coating Specialties & Supplies (“U.S. Coating”), and Earl Washington (“Washington”) (docket entry 121), and Motion for Preliminary Injunction Requiring Indemnitors to Post Collateral During Pendency of this Action (docket entry 125). On September 9, 2013, the Court entered an Order deferring these motions until trial. On November 27, 2013, the parties notified the Court that they had reached a settlement and the trial was cancelled. The motions are therefore moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America’s Motion for Summary Judgment against Mid State Construction Company, Inc., U.S. Coating Specialties & Supplies, and Earl Washington (docket entry 121), and Motion for Preliminary Injunction Requiring Indemnitors to Post Collateral During Pendency of this Action (docket entry 125) are MOOT; SO ORDERED, this the 25th day of March, 2014. /s/ David Bramlette UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?