Bailey v. Jefferson County, Mississippi et al

Filing 48

ORDER granting plaintiff's ore tenus motion for additional time to respond to defendant's motion for summary judgment. Response due 3/8/2013 Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 3/4/2013 (ECW)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
WESTERN DIVISION
CARL BAILEY

PLAINTIFF

VS.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-22(DCB)(MTP)

JEFFERSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
This cause is before the Court on a motion ore tenus by the
plaintiff for additional time to respond to the defendants’ motion
for summary judgment, and the defendants having represented to the
Court that they have no objection to the motion, the Court finds
that it should be granted.
IT

IS

HEREBY

Accordingly,

ORDERED

that

the

plaintiff’s

motion

for

additional time to respond to the defendants’ motion for summary
judgment is GRANTED, and the plaintiff’s response shall be due on
or before March 8, 2013.
SO ORDERED, this the 4th day of March, 2013.

/s/ David Bramlette
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE