Winding v. Sanders et al

Filing 88

ORDER denying 87 Motion to reopen case Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 3/23/2016 (ECW)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
WESTERN DIVISION
JAMES WINDING,

#K8115

PLAINTIFF

VS.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-88(DCB)(JMR)

LILLIE BLACKMON SANDERS;
ADAMS COUNTY JAIL; CRAIG GODBOLD;
KEVIN COLBERT; NATCHEZ POLICE DEPARTMENT;
CHRISTOPHER EPPS; and RONNIE HARPER

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
This

cause

is

before

the

Court

on

the

plaintiff

James

Winding’s Motion to Arrest Order #86 Based upon Mail Box Rule
(docket entry 87).

Being fully advised in the premises, the Court

finds that the Final Judgment dismissing this case with prejudice
was entered on March 6, 2013.

The plaintiff did not file a notice

of appeal within 30 days of the entry of judgment, and did not
timely file a Rule 59(e) motion nor a Rule 60(b) motion.

To the

extent that the present pleading can be construed as a motion to
reopen this civil case, it must be denied for the same reasons the
plaintiff’s previous motions to reopen this case were denied.
docket entries 82 and 86.

See

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiff James Winding’s Motion
to Arrest Order (docket entry 87) is DENIED as untimely.
SO ORDERED, this the 23rd day of March, 2016.

/s/ David Bramlette
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE