McKinney v. Vincent et al

Filing 29

ORDER directing plaintiff, if he wishes to pursue claims, to file a separate action unrelated to this case. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 10/1/2014 (ECW)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION AARON McKINNEY PLAINTIFF VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-135(DCB)(MTP) RAYMOND BYRD, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER This cause is before the Court on the plaintiff’s Objection to Report and Recommendations (docket entry 27). A final judgment was rendered in this case on August 21, 2013, and the case was closed. The plaintiff’s plaintiff is Mississippi objections complaining Correctional are about untimely. prison Institute Furthermore, conditions (“SMCI”) in at the South Leakesville, Mississippi, to which he was transferred subsequent to the filing of his case against Raymond Byrd, Warden at Wilkinson County Correctional Facility, et al. In order to pursue his claims against SMCI, the plaintiff must file a new Compliant under a new cause number. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that if the plaintiff wishes to pursue his claims against SMCI, he must do so in a separate action unrelated to this case, as this case has been closed. SO ORDERED, this the 1st day of October, 2014. /s/ David Bramlette UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?