McKinney v. Vincent et al
Filing
29
ORDER directing plaintiff, if he wishes to pursue claims, to file a separate action unrelated to this case. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 10/1/2014 (ECW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
WESTERN DIVISION
AARON McKINNEY
PLAINTIFF
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-135(DCB)(MTP)
RAYMOND BYRD, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
This cause is before the Court on the plaintiff’s Objection to
Report and Recommendations (docket entry 27). A final judgment was
rendered in this case on August 21, 2013, and the case was closed.
The
plaintiff’s
plaintiff
is
Mississippi
objections
complaining
Correctional
are
about
untimely.
prison
Institute
Furthermore,
conditions
(“SMCI”)
in
at
the
South
Leakesville,
Mississippi, to which he was transferred subsequent to the filing
of his case against Raymond Byrd, Warden at Wilkinson County
Correctional Facility, et al.
In order to pursue his claims
against SMCI, the plaintiff must file a new Compliant under a new
cause number.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that if the plaintiff wishes to pursue
his claims against SMCI, he must do so in a separate action
unrelated to this case, as this case has been closed.
SO ORDERED, this the 1st day of October, 2014.
/s/ David Bramlette
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?