Wilson v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI et al

Filing 20

ORDER OF DISMISSAL adopting 19 Report and Recommendations. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball is hereby adopted as the finding of this Court. The Petition is dismissed with prejudice. A judgment will be entered in a separate docket entry to follow.Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on February 26, 2016. (SP)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION DONALD JAMES WILSON PETITIONER VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13cv248-DPJ-FKB STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and RONALD KING RESPONDENTS ORDER OF DISMISSAL This habeas petition filed under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation [19] of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. On February 1, 2016, after considering the Petition [1] and the competent record evidence, Judge Ball recommended that habeas relief be denied and the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Wilson was directed to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days of being served with a copy. To date, Wilson has not filed any objections. The Court, now having fully reviewed the unopposed Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court. The Petition is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 26th day of February, 2016. s/ Daniel P. Jordan III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?