Wilson v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI et al
Filing
20
ORDER OF DISMISSAL adopting 19 Report and Recommendations. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball is hereby adopted as the finding of this Court. The Petition is dismissed with prejudice. A judgment will be entered in a separate docket entry to follow.Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on February 26, 2016. (SP)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
WESTERN DIVISION
DONALD JAMES WILSON
PETITIONER
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13cv248-DPJ-FKB
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and
RONALD KING
RESPONDENTS
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
This habeas petition filed under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 is before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation [19] of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. On February 1, 2016,
after considering the Petition [1] and the competent record evidence, Judge Ball recommended
that habeas relief be denied and the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Wilson was directed to
file any objections to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days of being served
with a copy. To date, Wilson has not filed any objections. The Court, now having fully
reviewed the unopposed Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and
Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court.
The Petition is dismissed with prejudice.
A separate judgment will be entered as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 26th day of February, 2016.
s/ Daniel P. Jordan III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?