Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. Prinzo

Filing 94

ORDER re 91 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. The defendant, Phillip Prinzo, shall file his Response to the plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment within 10 days from the date of entry of this Order. Failure to file a timely response could result in Sanctions, as set forth in the Order. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 12/20/2016 (ECW)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
WESTERN DIVISION
RONALDO DESIGNER JEWELRY, INC.
VS.

PLAINTIFF

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-cv-73(DCB)(MTP)

PHILLIP PRINZO

DEFENDANT
ORDER

This cause is before the Court on the plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment, filed November 30, 2016 (docket entry 91). The
defendant has failed to respond to the motion within 14 days as
required by Rule 7(b)(4) of the Local Uniform Civil Rules of this
Court.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant, Phillip Prinzo, shall
file his response to the plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
within ten (10) days from the date of entry of this ORDER.

Failure

to file a timely response could result in sanctions against the
defendant,

which

could

include

entry

of

default

against

the

defendant, and ultimately entry of a default judgment. See Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure 55 and 56; Cash Flow Resources, LLC v.
Hard Rock Specialized, LLC, 2013 WL 12122000 (S.D. Miss. Dec. 12,
2013).
SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of December, 2016.

/s/ David Bramlette
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE