Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. Prinzo
ORDER re 91 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. The defendant, Phillip Prinzo, shall file his Response to the plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment within 10 days from the date of entry of this Order. Failure to file a timely response could result in Sanctions, as set forth in the Order. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 12/20/2016 (ECW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
RONALDO DESIGNER JEWELRY, INC.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-cv-73(DCB)(MTP)
This cause is before the Court on the plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment, filed November 30, 2016 (docket entry 91). The
defendant has failed to respond to the motion within 14 days as
required by Rule 7(b)(4) of the Local Uniform Civil Rules of this
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant, Phillip Prinzo, shall
file his response to the plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
within ten (10) days from the date of entry of this ORDER.
to file a timely response could result in sanctions against the
defendant, and ultimately entry of a default judgment. See Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure 55 and 56; Cash Flow Resources, LLC v.
Hard Rock Specialized, LLC, 2013 WL 12122000 (S.D. Miss. Dec. 12,
SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of December, 2016.
/s/ David Bramlette
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?