Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. Prinzo

Filing 94

ORDER re 91 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. The defendant, Phillip Prinzo, shall file his Response to the plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment within 10 days from the date of entry of this Order. Failure to file a timely response could result in Sanctions, as set forth in the Order. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 12/20/2016 (ECW)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION RONALDO DESIGNER JEWELRY, INC. VS. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-cv-73(DCB)(MTP) PHILLIP PRINZO DEFENDANT ORDER This cause is before the Court on the plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed November 30, 2016 (docket entry 91). The defendant has failed to respond to the motion within 14 days as required by Rule 7(b)(4) of the Local Uniform Civil Rules of this Court. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant, Phillip Prinzo, shall file his response to the plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment within ten (10) days from the date of entry of this ORDER. Failure to file a timely response could result in sanctions against the defendant, which could include entry of default against the defendant, and ultimately entry of a default judgment. See Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55 and 56; Cash Flow Resources, LLC v. Hard Rock Specialized, LLC, 2013 WL 12122000 (S.D. Miss. Dec. 12, 2013). SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of December, 2016. /s/ David Bramlette UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?