King v. Social Security Administration
Filing
5
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of U. S. Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker denying Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 2 . Plaintiff is given sixty (60) days from the date of this Order to pay all costs associated with th e filing of this lawsuit. Should Plaintiff fail to timely pay all of the costs associated with the filing of this lawsuit, this matter may be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on January 20, 2015 (dsl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
WESTERN DIVISION
HOMER KELLY KING
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14cv77-KS-MTP
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation
of the United States Magistrate Judge entered herein on October 27, 2014, after referral
of hearing by this Court, no objections having been filed as to the Report and
Recommendation, and the Court, having fully reviewed the same as well as the record
in this matter, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and
Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation be, and
the same hereby is, adopted as the finding of this Court, and the Request to Proceed In
Forma Pauperis [2] filed by Plaintiff Homer Kelly King is hereby denied. Plaintiff is
given sixty (60) days from the date of this Order to pay all costs associated with the
filing of this lawsuit. Further, should Plaintiff fail to timely pay all of the costs associated
with the filling of this lawsuit, this matter may be dismissed without prejudice and without
further notice.
SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2015.
s/Keith Starrett
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?