Rodriguez v. Wagner

Filing 10

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 8 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 11/10/2016 (EB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION ROLANDO RODRIGUEZ v. PETITIONER CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-cv-107 (DCB)(MTP) BARBARA WAGNER RESPONDENT ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This cause is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker’s Report and Recommendation (docket entry 8), to which no objections were filed by the Petitioner. Having carefully reviewed the same, the Court finds that the Petitioner is not entitled to pursue his claims in a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Furthermore, if he were to pursue a civil rights claim instead, he has not asserted a violation of a constitutionally protected right entitling him to relief under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation, and shall dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker’s Report and Recommendation (docket entry 8) is ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. A Final Judgment dismissing the Petition with prejudice will follow in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. SO ORDERED, this the 10th day of November, 2016. /s/ David Bramlette UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?