Whittington v. City of McComb
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 25 Report and Recommendations. A Final Judgment dismissing the case with prejudice will follow in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 2/8/2017 (ND)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-cv-52-DCB-MTP
CITY OF MCCOMB
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This cause is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Michael T.
Parker’s Report and Recommendation (docket entry 25), to which no
objections were filed.
Having carefully reviewed the same, the
Court finds that Plaintiff’s claims are subject to dismissal
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
Since the commencement of
this civil action on June 9, 2015, the Court has granted pro se
plaintiff Mike Whittington multiple opportunities to amend his
pleadings and clarify the allegations asserted therein. See Orders
amendments have failed to state any plausible claim for relief
Furthermore, Plaintiff’s claims arising under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 are time-barred. See Hubbard v. Miss. Conference of United
Methodist Church, 138 F. Supp. 2d 780, 782 (S.D. Miss. 2001) (“[I]n
Mississippi, the general three-year statute of limitations of
section 15-1-49 of the Mississippi Code applies to section 1983
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker’s
Report and Recommendation (docket entry 23) is ADOPTED as the
findings and conclusions of this Court.
A Final Judgment dismissing the case with prejudice will
follow in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
SO ORDERED, this the 8th day of February, 2017.
/s/ David Bramlette_________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?