Wilson et al v. Richardson

Filing 21

ORDER requiring plaintiffs' counsel to furnish the Court with a proposed Judgment in the amount of $25,000 as well as counsel's bill of costs including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses, and to incorporate these into the proposed Judgment, subject to review by the Court. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 11/14/2016 (ECW)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION ROBERT H. WILSON, SUE ELLEN OBERG, and PAULETTE BELL VS. PLAINTIFFS CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-cv-65(DCB)(MTP) JAMES RICHARDSON DEFENDANT ORDER This cause is before the Court sua sponte to enforce the Court’s Order of May 27, 2016, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to enforce settlement agreement, and the Court, being desirous that this matter be finally closed on its docket, finds as follows: On February 24, 2016, the parties reached a settlement at a conference held by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker, and the terms of settlement were placed on the record. On February 25, 2016, the Court ordered that this case be dismissed and that the parties comply with the terms of their settlement agreement. Under the terms of settlement, the defendant was to pay the settlement proceeds to the plaintiffs within two weeks of the February 25, 2016 Order of Dismissal. specifically retained jurisdiction to enforce the The Court settlement agreement, and informed the parties that they may move to reopen the case for enforcement of the settlement agreement if any party fails to comply with the terms of settlement. represented by counsel. All parties are On March 23, 2016, counsel for the plaintiffs filed a motion to enforce settlement agreement, which was granted. The plaintiffs’ motion sought immediate payment of the settlement proceeds, plus all attorneys fees and costs for prosecution of the plaintiffs’ motion, to be paid by the defendant James Richardson. On May 27, 2016, the Court entered an Order granting the motion to enforce settlement, ordered the defendant to pay the settlement proceeds ($25,000), and ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiffs’ counsels’ fees and other costs in enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement. Finally, the Court ordered plaintiffs’ counsel to furnish the Court with a proposed Judgment in the amount of $25,000 as well as counsel’s bill of costs including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses, and to incorporate these into the proposed Judgment, subject to review by the Court. The proposed Judgment has not been delivered to the Court. On October 20, 2016, the Court received a letter from Paulette Bell, one of the plaintiffs, advising the Court that the plaintiffs have not received any compensation, and requesting the terms of the settlement agreement. The terms of the settlement agreement are set forth in this Order. The Court finds that the plaintiffs’ attorneys have failed to comply with this Court’s Order of May 27, 2016. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel for the plaintiffs comply 2 with the Court’s previous Order by furnishing the Court with a proposed Judgment in the amount of $25,000 as well as counsel’s bill of costs including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses, and to incorporate these into the proposed Judgment, subject to review by the Court. SO ORDERED, this the 14th day of November, 2016. /s/ David Bramlette UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?