Brooks et al v. Illusions, Inc et al
Filing
34
ORDER. Response to Motion to Enforce Order and for Civil Contempt 31 due on or before January 27, 2017, and rebuttal due on or before February 3, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/18/2017 (dtj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
WESTERN DIVISION
ASHLEY BROOKS et al.
v.
PLAINTIFFS
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5-16-CV-31-KS-MTP
ILLUSIONS, INC., et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
On January 13, 2017, Plaintiffs (“Movants”) filed their Motion to Enforce Order and for
Civil Contempt [31]. Defendants (“Respondents”) have until on or before January 27, 2017, to
respond to this motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If Movants wish to file a
rebuttal, they may do so on or before February 3, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R.
7(b)(4).
If either Movants or Respondents require an extension of time, they must file a motion for
such prior to the deadline’s expiration. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). Any party seeking an extension must
advise the Court whether it is opposed. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(10).
Movants’ original and reply memoranda shall not exceed a combined total of thirty-five
(35) pages, and Respondents’ response shall not exceed thirty-five (35) pages. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(5).
If a party requires more pages to fully respond, they may seek leave to do file an excess of pages.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, on this, the
18th
day of January, 2017.
s/Keith Starrett________________
KEITH STARRETT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?