Brooks et al v. Illusions, Inc et al

Filing 40

ORDER granting 31 Motion for Contempt. Defendants are fined $100.00 per day, to be paid daily into the registry of the Court until such time that they are in full compliance with the Court's Order 23 . Plaintiffs are awarded reasonable attorney's fees in connection with their efforts to enforce the Court's Order 23 . Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 2/14/2017 (dtj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION ASHLEY BROOKS, et al. v. PLAINTIFFS CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:16-CV-31-KS-MTP ILLUSIONS, INC., et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Enforce Order and for Civil Contempt (“Motion for Contempt”) [31]. Plaintiffs assert that Defendants Illusions, Inc., and Thomas Walsh (collectively “Defendants”) are in contempt of the Court’s previous Order [23] issued on November 16, 2016, which required Defendants to “provide to Plaintiff, in usable electronic form, the names, addresses, email addresses, social media handles/identifiers, and phone numbers of all members of the prospective class” within ten (10) days from the date of that order. (Order [23] at p. 5.) In their two-page Response [36] to the Motion for Contempt [31], Defendants summarily state that they have turned over all of the information in their records, a statement belied by Defendants’ own counsel during a phone conference with the Magistrate. (See Attorney Affidavit [31-3] at ¶ 10.) Counsel for Defendants represented during that conference that his clients had the information required by the Order [23] but did not wish to turn it over because of privacy concerns. (See id.) “In a civil contempt proceeding, the party seeking an order of contempt need only establish (1) that a court order was in effect, and (2) that the order required certain conduct by the respondent, and (3) that the respondent failed to comply with the court’s order.” F.D.I.C. v. LeGrand, 43 F.3d 163, 170 (5th Cir. 1995) (citing Martin v. Trinity Indus., Inc., 959 F.2d 45, 47 (5th Cir. 1992)). Plaintiffs have established these elements, and the Court finds that Defendants should be held in civil contempt. The Motion for Contempt [31] will be granted. Defendants will be fined $100 per day, to be paid daily into the registry of the Court until they comply with the Court’s Order [23]. Defendants also will be required to pay Plaintiffs’ reasonable attorney’s fees in connection to their efforts to enforce the Court’s Order [23]. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion for Contempt [31] is granted. Defendants are fined $100 per day, to be paid daily into the registry of the Court until such time that they are in full compliance with the Court’s Order [23]. Plaintiffs are awarded reasonable attorney’s fees in connection to their efforts to enforce the Court’s Order [23]. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED on this the 14th day of February, 2017. s/Keith Starrett_________________ KEITH STARRETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?