Chambliss et al v. Lincoln Motor Company et al

Filing 10

AGREED ORDER granting ore tenus motion for extension of time to file response. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on January 30, 2017. (lda)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION MALINDA CHAMBLISS; OLIVER CHAMBLISS, JR.; GARRVIN VONDELL BARNES, JR.; KOCH RASHUN LIGGANS, AND OCTAVE CHAMBLISS, MINORS, BY AND THROUGH THEIR MOTHER, NEXT FRIEND, AND GUARDIAN, MALINDA CHAMBLISS VS. PLAINTIFFS CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:16-CV-00125-DCB-MTP LINCOLN MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-10 DEFENDANTS AGREED ORDER This matter is before the Court on the unopposed ore tenus motion of Defendant Ford Motor Company to extend its deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand. The Court, having considered the motion and being advised that Plaintiffs agree to the requested extension, finds that the motion is well-taken and due to be granted. It is therefore, ordered, that Ford's response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand shall be due no later than February 3, 2017. BY ORDER OF THIS COURT, this the 30th day of January, 2017. s/David Bramlette U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE AGREED TO: /s/ James D. Shannon James D. Shannon Counsel for Plaintiffs /s/ Michael E. Keyton Michael E. Keyton Counsel for Plaintiffs /s/ Clay Gunn Clay Gunn Counsel for Ford Motor Company

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?