Watts v. Pickett et al

Filing 37

ORDER denying 17 Letter Motion to be Placed in Protective Custody; adopting 24 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on December 11, 2017 (JBR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION CARL WATTS PLAINTIFF v. CAUSE NO. 5:17-cv-38-DCB-MTP RICHARD PICKETT, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This cause is before the Court on the Letter Motion to Be Placed in Protective Custody [Doc. 17] filed by Plaintiff Carl Watts and the unobjected-to Report and Recommendation [Doc. 24] of Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Magistrate Judge Parker recommends that the Court deny Watts’s motion. Watts is an inmate housed at Wilkinson County Correctional Facility. He asks the Court to order Defendants to place him in a protective custody unit in another prison. Watts seeks a transfer because he fears that other prisoners who have robbed and assaulted him in the past will do so again. Liberally construing Watts’s motion as a request for a preliminary injunction, Magistrate Judge Parker concludes that Watts shows neither a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, nor the possibility of irreparable harm. In so holding, Magistrate Judge Parker finds that Defendants have implemented safety measures minimizing the risk that Watts will fall victim to another prison attack. Magistrate Judge Parker further finds that Watts fails to show that these safety measures are insufficient or that they will not be followed. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 24] of Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker, to which no objections were filed, is ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court; FURTHER ORDERED that the Letter Motion to Be Placed in Protective Custody [Doc. 17] filed by Plaintiff Carl Watts is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this the 11th day of December, 2017. /s/ David Bramlette_________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?