Watts v. Pickett et al
Filing
37
ORDER denying 17 Letter Motion to be Placed in Protective Custody; adopting 24 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on December 11, 2017 (JBR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
WESTERN DIVISION
CARL WATTS
PLAINTIFF
v.
CAUSE NO. 5:17-cv-38-DCB-MTP
RICHARD PICKETT, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This cause is before the Court on the Letter Motion to Be
Placed in Protective Custody [Doc. 17] filed by Plaintiff Carl
Watts and the unobjected-to Report and Recommendation [Doc. 24] of
Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker.
Magistrate
Judge
Parker
recommends
that
the
Court
deny
Watts’s motion. Watts is an inmate housed at Wilkinson County
Correctional Facility. He asks the Court to order Defendants to
place him in a protective custody unit in another prison. Watts
seeks a transfer because he fears that other prisoners who have
robbed and assaulted him in the past will do so again.
Liberally
construing
Watts’s
motion
as
a
request
for
a
preliminary injunction, Magistrate Judge Parker concludes that
Watts shows neither a substantial likelihood of success on the
merits, nor the possibility of irreparable harm. In so holding,
Magistrate Judge Parker finds that Defendants have implemented
safety measures minimizing the risk that Watts will fall victim to
another prison attack. Magistrate Judge Parker further finds that
Watts fails to show that these safety measures are insufficient or
that they will not be followed.
ACCORDINGLY,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc.
24] of Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker, to which no objections
were filed, is ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this
Court;
FURTHER ORDERED
that the Letter Motion to Be Placed in
Protective Custody [Doc. 17] filed by Plaintiff Carl Watts is
DENIED.
SO ORDERED, this the 11th day of December, 2017.
/s/ David Bramlette_________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?