Winding v. McClure et al

Filing 29

ORDER denying Petitioner's Motion #20 to Arrest Final Judgment. Signed by District Judge David C. Bramlette, III on May 18, 2023. (lda)

Download PDF
Case 5:23-cv-00029-DCB-FKB Document 29 Filed 05/18/23 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION JAMES C. WINDING VERSUS PETITIONER CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-cv-29-DCB-FKB APPEAL NO. (to be assigned) MARC McCLURE, Superintendent, et al. RESPONDENTS ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO ARREST FINAL JUDGMENT This matter is before the Court on Petitioner James C. Winding’s (“Petitioner”) Motion to Arrest Final Judgment (“Motion”) [ECF No. 20]. The Court, having examined the Motion, the record, the applicable legal authority, and being fully informed in the premises, finds that the Motion should be denied. Petitioner’s arguments in the instant Motion are very similar to his arguments in his previously filed Motion to Reconsider [ECF No. 14]. In both Motions [ECF No. 20] [ECF No. 14], Petitioner argues that the Court should allow him to proceed with this § 2254 habeas action because the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in In re Winding, No. 2290065 (5th Cir. 2023) does not apply. Petitioner’s argument is based on his claim that he is not challenging his conviction or sentence and that 18 U.S.C. § 1203 prohibiting hostage-taking applies. The Court’s Order [ECF No. 24] has addressed these arguments and has denied Petitioner’s request to reconsider the Case 5:23-cv-00029-DCB-FKB Document 29 Filed 05/18/23 Page 2 of 2 dismissal of this § 2254 habeas civil action. For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order [ECF No. 24] and because Petitioner has already raised his arguments in his previously filed Motion [ECF No. 14], Petitioner’s Motion is not well-taken. For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner’s Motion will be denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Arrest Final Judgment [ECF No. 20] is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this the 18th day of May, 2023. s/David Bramlette UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?