Massey v. Social Security Administration

Filing 18

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 16) is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, andPlaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Judgment will accompany this Order. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 6/14/2010. (JMC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION KARI MASSEY, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:09CV0093 JCH MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter arises on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David D. Noce, filed May 3, 2010. See 28 U.S.C. §636. In his report, Magistrate Judge Noce recommends that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice. (Doc. No. 16). Plaintiff was granted fourteen (14) days to object to the recommendation. On May 7, 2010, Plaintiff filed her Objections to Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge. After review of the entire record in this matter, the Court concurs in the Magistrate Judge's findings, and will adopt the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court will affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this case with prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 16) is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Judgment will accompany this Order. Dated this 14th day of June, 2010. /s/ Jean C. Hamilton UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?