Emmons v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. et al

Filing 140

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 139 MOTION to Stay Proceedings with Supporting Suggestions filed by Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.; motion is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Pr oceedings With Supporting Suggestions (ECF No. 139) is GRANTED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is STAYED for ninety (90) days to allow the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to rule on Plaintiffs Motion for Relief. Prior to the expiration of the stay, the parties can ask for additional time, if necessary.. Signed by Honorable John A. Ross on 4/30/12. (CSG)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION GARY EMMONS, et ux., Plaintiffs, v. BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC, et al., Defendants. v. EMMONS SAWMILL, LLC, Third Party Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:10CV41 JAR MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.’s Motion to Stay Proceedings With Supporting Suggestions (ECF No. 139). Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc. seeks an order staying all proceedings in this action against it unless and until such time as the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware rules on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Relief. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.’s Motion to Stay Proceedings With Supporting Suggestions (ECF No. 139) is GRANTED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is STAYED for ninety (90) days to allow the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to rule on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Relief. Prior to the expiration of the stay, the parties can ask for additional time, if necessary. Dated this 30th day of April, 2012. JOHN A. ROSS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?