Bishop v. Crawford et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 70 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Charles H. Bishop motion is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/28/12. (MRS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
CHARLES H. BISHOP,
LARRY CRAWFORD, et al.,
Case No. 1:11CV00011 SNLJ
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for appointment of
counsel, #70. The motion will be denied.
There is no constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in civil cases.
Nelson v. Redfield Lithograph Printing, 728 F.2d 1003, 1004 (8th Cir. 1984). In
determining whether to appoint counsel, the Court considers several factors,
including (1) whether the plaintiff has presented non-frivolous allegations supporting
his or her prayer for relief; (2) whether the plaintiff will substantially benefit from the
appointment of counsel; (3) whether there is a need to further investigate and present
the facts related to the plaintiff’s allegations; and (4) whether the factual and legal
issues presented by the action are complex. See Johnson v. Williams, 788 F.2d 1319,
1322-23 (8th Cir. 1986); Nelson, 728 F.2d at 1005.
After considering these factors, the Court finds that the facts and legal issues
involved are not so complicated that the appointment of counsel is warranted at this
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for appointment of
counsel is DENIED without prejudice.
Dated this 28th day of November, 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?