McCoy et al v. Financial Courier Services, Inc. et al
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by September 19, 2011, defendant shall file an amended removal petition which shall allege facts establishing the citizenship of each of Abadie Enterprises LLC and Craneinavan LLC's members. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if defendant does not timely and fully comply with this order, this matter will be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Response to Court due by 9/19/2011. Signed by Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/29/2011. (JMC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
TRAVIS MCCOY, et al.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MARY SCHUBERT, et al.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:11-CV-80 SNLJ
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on review of the file following assignment to the
undersigned. The Eight Circuit has admonished district courts to “be attentive to a satisfaction of
jurisdictional requirements in all cases.” Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 823 F.2d 214, 216 (8th Cir.
1987). “In every federal case the court must be satisfied that it has jurisdiction before it turns to
the merits of other legal arguments.” Carlson v. Arrowhead Concrete Works, Inc., 445 F.3d
1046, 1050 (8th Cir. 2006). “A plaintiff who seeks to invoke diversity jurisdiction of the federal
courts must plead citizenship distinctly and affirmatively.” 15 James Wm. Moore, et al.,
Moore’s Federal Practice § 102.31 (3d ed. 2010). Because this action has been removed from
state court to this Court, the party seeking to invoke diversity jurisdiction is the defendant;
however, the party seeking removal has burden of establishing federal subject matter jurisdiction.
In re Business Men’s Assur. Co. of America, 992 F.2d 181, 183 (8th Cir. 1993).
The Notice of Removal (#1) asserts that the Court has jurisdiction over the action
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because the lawsuit is between citizens of different States and the
matter in controversy exceeds the sum of $75,000. The Petition alleges that two of the plaintiffs,
Abadie Enterprises LLC and Craneinavan LLC “are corporate entities with their principle [sic]
place of business and residence in Liverpool, New York.” Citizenship for those plaintiffs have
been partially addressed like that of a corporation, which is a citizen of its state of organization
and its principal place of business. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a), (c)(1); Sanders, 823 F.2d at 215
n.1. Although the plaintiffs’ complaint identifies those entities as “corporations,” their names —
Abadie Enterprises LLC and Craneinavan LLC — indicate that they may in fact be limited
liability companies. The Eighth Circuit has held that limited liability companies are citizens of
every state of which any member is a citizen. See GMAC Commercial Credit, LLC v. Dillard
Dep’t Stores, Inc., 357 F.3d 827, 829 (8th Cir. 2004). Thus, the Court must examine the
citizenship of each member of Abadie Enterprises LLC and Craneinavan LLC to determine
whether diversity jurisdiction exists. The Notice of Removal contains no allegations concerning
the members of Abadie Enterprises LLC and Craneinavan LLC or the citizenship of those
members.
The Court will grant defendant twenty-one (21) days to file an amended petition which
alleges facts showing the existence of the requisite diversity of citizenship of the parties. If
defendant fails to timely and fully comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this matter
without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by September 19, 2011, defendant shall file an
amended removal petition which shall allege facts establishing the citizenship of each of Abadie
Enterprises LLC and Craneinavan LLC’s members.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if defendant does not timely and fully comply with
this order, this matter will be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
2
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that all other proceedings in this case are STAYED
pending further order of this Court.
Dated this
29th
day of August, 2011.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?