Irma Joyce Sanders v. Astrue
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 18 Social Security Cross Brief, Motion for Relief filed by Michael J. Astrue, 19 Report and Recommendations, 15 Social Security Brief filed by Irma Joyce Sanders. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United StatesMagistrate Judge 19 is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, andPlaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Judgment will accompany this Order. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/19/2012. (JMC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
IRMA JOYCE SANDERS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:11CV203 JAR
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Nannette A. Baker, filed December 3, 2012 (ECF No. 19). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636,
the Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Baker. Magistrate Judge Baker recommends that
the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint with prejudice.
Plaintiff was granted until December 17, 2012 to file any written objections to the recommendation,
but to date has filed no objections..
Upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge [19] is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and
Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Judgment will accompany this
Order.
Dated this 19th day of December, 2012.
JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?