Wallace v. Astrue
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff Shawn M. Wallace disability benefits is AFFIRMED, and the Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED, with prejudice. Dated this 4th day of April, 2013. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 4/4/2013. (JMC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
SHAWN M.. WALLACE,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,1
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:11CV00215 ERW (FRB)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Frederick R. Buckles [ECF No. 19], pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
The Court notes that no objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation within
the time period afforded by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court has considered the Report and
Recommendation, and hereby sustains, adopts, and incorporates herein the Magistrate’s Report
and Recommendation in its entirety. The Social Security Commissioner’s decision denying
Plaintiff’s claims for benefits is affirmed.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the final
decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff Shawn M. Wallace disability
benefits is AFFIRMED, and the Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED, with prejudice.
Dated this
4th
day of April, 2013.
E. RICHARD WEBBER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
On February 14, 2013, Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social
Security. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Carolyn W. Colvin is therefore automatically
substituted for former Commissioner Michael J. Astrue as defendant in this cause of action.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?