Matthes v. Social Security Administration

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 20 SOCIAL SECURITY BRIEF filed by Tammy Sue Matthes, 27 SOCIAL SECURITY CROSS BRIEF re 20 Memorandum filed by Michael J. Astrue, 20 SOCIAL SECURITY BRIEF fil ed by Plaintiff Tammy Sue Matthes, 27 SOCIAL SECURITY CROSS BRIEF re 20 Memorandum filed by Defendant Michael J. Astrue. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is sustained, adopted and in corporated herein. [Doc. 29]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff's application for Supplemental Security Income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/14/13. (CSG)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

TAMMY SUE MATHES,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,1
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 1:12-CV-14 CAS

ORDER
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Nannette A. Baker, filed February 26, 2013. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The Magistrate
Judge recommended that the decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff’s application for
Supplemental Security Income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 1381, et seq. be affirmed. Neither party has filed an objection to the recommendation.
After careful review of the matter, the Court concurs with the recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the well-reasoned Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge is sustained, adopted and incorporated herein. [Doc. 29]

1

Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14,
2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin is
substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff’s
application for Supplemental Security Income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act
is AFFIRMED.
An appropriate judgment will accompany this order.

CHARLES A. SHAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated this 14th day of March, 2013.

2