Miller v. Astrue

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS..Upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States MagistrateJudge (Doc. No. 20) is SUSTAINE D, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, andPlaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Judgment will accompany this Order. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 3/18/13. (MRS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JOSEPH MILLER, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:12-CV-00015 ORDER This matter arises on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles, filed February 28, 2013. See 28 U.S.C. § 636. In his report, Magistrate Judge Buckles recommends that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint with prejudice. Neither party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 20) is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Judgment will accompany this Order. Dated this 18th day of March, 2013. /s/Jean C. Hamilton UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?