Cruz-Zuniga v. USA
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Petitioner Horacio Cruz-Zuniga; motion is DENIED without prejudice. An Order of Dismissal will be filed with this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 4/3/13. (CSG)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
HORACIO CRUZ-ZUNIGA,
Movant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:12-CV-0118-RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before me on movant’s “motion in response to court’s
Memorandum and Order.” I previously ordered movant to show cause why his
motion to vacate under § 2255 should not be dismissed as time-barred, and I ordered
him to file an amended motion to vacate if he wished to continue with this case.
Movant has informed me that I mistakenly construed his motion to extend the time
to file a § 2255 motion as a motion to vacate under § 2255. Movant requests that I
rule the motion to extend regardless of the fact that he has not filed a motion to
vacate. Additionally, he has failed to file an amended motion as I directed.
For a district court to have jurisdiction over a motion to extend the time to file
a § 2255 motion, the motion “must be either be filed concurrently with or after a
§ 2255 petition, or be construed as the § 2255 petition itself.” Ramirez v. United
States, 461 F. Supp. 2d 439, 441 (E.D. Va. 2006). The court is permitted to construe
a motion for extension of time as a § 2255 motion when it “contains allegations
sufficient to support a claim under section 2255.” Id.
In this case, movant’s motion for extension of time does not contain sufficient
allegations for the Court to construe it as a § 2255 motion. As a result, the motion
will be denied.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant’s motion for extension of time [Doc.
1] is DENIED without prejudice.
An Order of Dismissal will be filed with this Memorandum and Order.
Dated this 3rd day of April, 2013.
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?