Roberts v. Lombardi et al
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Kyle A. Roberts, 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Kyle A. Roberts, 17 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Kyle A. Roberts.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motions for appointment of counsel [Docs. #4, #6, and #17] and motion for time to find a lawyer [Doc. #20] areDENIED, without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/23/12. (CSG)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
KYLE A. ROBERTS,
Plaintiff,
v.
GEORGE A. LOMBARDI, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:12-CV-134-SNLJ
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motions for appointment of
counsel [Docs. #4, #6, and #17] and motion for time to find a lawyer [Doc. #20]. The
motions will be denied without prejudice.
“A pro se litigant has no statutory or constitutional right to have counsel
appointed in a civil case.” Stevens v. Redwing, 146 F.3d 538, 546 (8th Cir. 1998).
When determining whether to appoint counsel for an indigent litigant, the Court
considers relevant factors, such as the complexity of the case, the ability of the pro
se litigant to investigate the facts, the existence of conflicting testimony, and the
ability of the pro se litigant to present his or her claim. Id.
After reviewing these factors, the Court finds that the appointment of counsel
is not warranted at this time. This case is neither factually nor legally complex, and
plaintiff has not alleged that he is hindered from investigating the facts of this case.
Consequently, the motions for appointment of counsel shall be denied without
prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for time to find an attorney will similarly be denied.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions for appointment of
counsel [Docs. #4, #6, and #17] and motion for time to find a lawyer [Doc. #20] are
DENIED, without prejudice.
Dated this 23rd Day of October, 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?