Woodrow v. Astrue
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Collins is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. The Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny Supplemental Security Income benefits to Plaintiff is affirmed. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 2/21/2014. (JMC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
GLENDELL WOODROW,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Cause No. 1:12 CV 156 RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before me on a Report and Recommendation to affirm the decision of the
Commissioner of Social Security to deny Plaintiff benefits under Title II of the Social Security
Act. Neither of the parties has filed an objection to this recommendation.
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins for a Report
and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Judge Collins issued a Report and
Recommendation on January 15, 2014 that recommended that the Commissioner’s decision to
deny benefits should be affirmed. Judge Collins found that the Administrative Law Judge’s
determination that Plaintiff was not entitled to benefits was supported by substantial evidence in
the record.
Any objections to Judge Collins’ Report and Recommendation had to be filed by January
29, 2014. Neither of the parties has filed an objection as of today’s date.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge Collins is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. The
Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny Supplemental Security Income benefits to
Plaintiff is affirmed.
_________________________________
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 21st day of February, 2014.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?