Woodrow v. Astrue

Filing 21

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Collins is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. The Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny Supplemental Security Income benefits to Plaintiff is affirmed. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 2/21/2014. (JMC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION GLENDELL WOODROW, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Cause No. 1:12 CV 156 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before me on a Report and Recommendation to affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny Plaintiff benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Neither of the parties has filed an objection to this recommendation. This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Judge Collins issued a Report and Recommendation on January 15, 2014 that recommended that the Commissioner’s decision to deny benefits should be affirmed. Judge Collins found that the Administrative Law Judge’s determination that Plaintiff was not entitled to benefits was supported by substantial evidence in the record. Any objections to Judge Collins’ Report and Recommendation had to be filed by January 29, 2014. Neither of the parties has filed an objection as of today’s date. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Collins is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. The Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny Supplemental Security Income benefits to Plaintiff is affirmed. _________________________________ RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 21st day of February, 2014. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?