Morton v. Astrue
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 18 SOCIAL SECURITY BRIEF filed by Ronald Wayne Morton, Jr., 27 SOCIAL SECURITY CROSS BRIEF re 11 Answer to Complaint filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, 18 SOCIAL SECURITY BRIEF file d by Plaintiff Ronald Wayne Morton, Jr., 27 SOCIAL SECURITY CROSS BRIEF re 11 Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff Ronald Wayne Morton, Jr. disability benefits is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED, with prejudice. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 4/9/14. (CSG)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
RONALD WAYNE MORTON, JR.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:12CV00175 ERW
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate David D. Noce [ECF No. 29], pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
The Court notes that no objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation within
the time period afforded by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court has considered the Report and
Recommendation, and hereby sustains, adopts, and incorporates herein the Magistrate’s Report
and Recommendation in its entirety. The Social Security Commissioner’s decision denying
Plaintiff’s claims for benefits is affirmed.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the final
decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff Ronald Wayne Morton, Jr.
disability benefits is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED, with prejudice.
Dated this
9th
day of April, 2014.
E. RICHARD WEBBER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?