Hopper v. Astrue
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 16 Social Security Cross Brief, Motion for Relief filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, 11 Social Security Brief filed by Eliza Hopper, 17 Report and Recommendations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein. A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/17/14. (CSG)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
ELIZA HOPPER,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:13CV00004 AGF/NAB
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker, to whom this matter was referred for recommended
disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On February 27, 2014, Magistrate Judge
Baker filed her Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Court affirm the
decision of the Administrative Law Judge to deny Plaintiff supplemental security income
under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Neither party has filed objections to the
Report and Recommendation.
Upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the record in
this case, the Court concurs with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the
Administrative Law Judge’s decision in this matter should be affirmed.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein.
A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.
_______________________________
AUDREY G. FLEISSIG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 17th day of March, 2014.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?