Killian et al v. Black Bullet Trucking, Inc.
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by March 7, 2013, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint which shall allege defendants principal place of business. Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 3/7/2013. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 2/21/2013. (JMC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
HAROLD KILLIAN and
HANA KILLIAN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
BLACK BULLET TRUCKING, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:13-CV-35 SNLJ
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on review of the file following assignment to the
undersigned. The Eight Circuit has admonished district courts to “be attentive to a satisfaction of
jurisdictional requirements in all cases.” Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 823 F.2d 214, 216 (8th Cir.
1987). “In every federal case the court must be satisfied that it has jurisdiction before it turns to
the merits of other legal arguments.” Carlson v. Arrowhead Concrete Works, Inc., 445 F.3d
1046, 1050 (8th Cir. 2006). “A plaintiff who seeks to invoke diversity jurisdiction of the federal
courts must plead citizenship distinctly and affirmatively.” 15 James Wm. Moore, et al.,
Moore’s Federal Practice § 102.31 (3d ed. 2010).
The Complaint (#1) asserts that the Court has jurisdiction over the action pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1332 because the lawsuit is between citizens of different States and the matter in
controversy exceeds the sum of $75,000. Plaintiffs allege that they are citizens of Arkansas and
that defendant is a corporation “organized and existing under and by virtue of Ohio law.”
However, a corporation is deemed to be a citizen of both the state in which it is incorporated and
the state where it has its principal place of business. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c). Plaintiff does not
allege where defendant has its principal place of business.
Because it is the plaintiffs’ burden in this case to establish subject matter jurisdiction, the
Court will grant plaintiff twenty-one (21) days to file an amended complaint which alleges facts
showing the existence of the requisite diversity of citizenship of the parties. If plaintiff fails to
timely and fully comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this matter without prejudice for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by March 7, 2013, plaintiff shall file an amended
complaint which shall allege defendant’s principal place of business.
Dated this 21st day of February, 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?