Coleman v. Hakala et al

Filing 69

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...granting 54 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Alonzo Dwayne Coleman. Terming re: 62 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Alonzo Dwayne Coleman, 57 PRO SE MOTION Order Compelling Physical Exam filed by Plaintiff Alonzo Dwayne Coleman without prejudice subject to refiling by counsel. ( Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 6/30/2014.), Attorney Shanna K. Surratt for Alonzo Dwayne Coleman added.. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/2/14. (MRS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION ALONZO DWAYNE COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL C. HAKALA, et al., Defendants, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:13CV61 SNLJ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel. The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this matter and is of the opinion that appointment of counsel would best serve the interests of justice. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. #54] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Shanna K. Surratt, MOSS AND STILLWELL LAW FIRM, 1471 N. Kingshighway, Cape Girardeau, MO, 63701, telephone number (573) 339-9223, fax (573) 339-9224, is appointed to represent plaintiff in this matter. The Clerk of Court shall provide a complete copy of the court file to plaintiff=s appointed counsel at no cost. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff=s counsel shall have until June 30, 2014 to file an amended complaint in this matter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions for physical exam and for preliminary injunction [Doc. #57 and #62] are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, subject to refiling by appointed counsel, if counsel so chooses. Dated this 2nd day of May, 2014. STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?