Wolfe v. Colvin
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 17) is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Judgment will accompany this Order. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 7/11/14. (MRS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
DEBORAH WOLFE,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security1,
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:13CV102 JCH/DDN
ORDER
This matter arises on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
David D. Noce, filed June 20, 2014. See 28 U.S.C. § 636. In his report, Magistrate Judge Noce
recommends that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss Plaintiff’s
Complaint with prejudice. Plaintiff was granted fourteen (14) days to object to the recommendation,
but to date has filed no objections.
Upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 17) is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein.
1
On February 14, 2013, Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social
Security. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Carolyn W. Colvin therefore is automatically
substituted for former Commissioner Michael J. Astrue as Defendant in this cause of action.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and
Plaintiff=s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Judgment will accompany this
Order.
Dated this 11th Day of July, 2014.
/s/Jean C. Hamilton
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?