Carter v. Mulcahy et al
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is given until Monday, March 24, 2014 to file an amended complaint, if he so desires. Response to Court due by 3/24/2014. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/17/14. (CSG)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
LARRY LASHAWN CARTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAPTAIN MULCAHY, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:13CV159 JAR
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff=s Response to the Answer of Defendants Susie
Gibbs, Charla Holder and Dr. Charles Pewitt to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (“Response”; ECF
No. 43). In the Response, Plaintiff complains of several events that were not included in his
Amended Complaint. The Court does not accept amendments by interlineation. If Plaintiff
wishes to amend his complaint again, he must provide a proposed amended complaint that
includes each and every claim he wishes to bring against every defendant in this action. Plaintiff
is warned that the filing of an amended complaint replaces the original complaint (and the current
amended complaint), and claims that are not realleged are deemed abandoned. E.g., In re
Wireless Telephone Federal Cost Recovery Fees Litigation, 396 F.3d 922, 928 (8th Cir. 2005).
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is given until Monday, March 24, 2014 to file
an amended complaint, if he so desires.
-1-
Dated this 17th day of March, 2014.
JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?