Carter v. Mulcahy et al

Filing 55

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Compel and for Sanctions 53 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to respond to Defendants' interrogatories and requests for production of documents no later than August 14, 2014. Failure to do so may result in sanction, up to and including dismissal of Plaintiff's lawsuit for failure to prosecute. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 7/30/2014. (JMC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION LARRY LASHAWN CARTER, Plaintiff, v. CAPT. JAMES MULCAHY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:13CV159 JAR MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court Defendants’ Motion to Compel and for Sanctions (ECF No. 53). Therein, Defendants contend that Plaintiff has not provided any responses to Defendants’ discovery requests. On May 30, 2014, Defendants sent a certified letter to Plaintiff, demanding his discovery responses, but Plaintiff did not respond. On July 15, 2014, Defendants filed this Motion to Compel and for Sanctions. Plaintiff has not responded to the Motion to Compel and for Sanctions and the time for filing a response has run. See E.D.Mo. L.R. 4.01(B). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Compel and for Sanctions [53] is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to respond to Defendants’ interrogatories and requests for production of documents no later than August 14, 2014. Failure to do so may result in sanction, up to and including dismissal of Plaintiff=s lawsuit for failure to prosecute. Dated this 30th day of July, 2014. JOHN A. ROSS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?