Yount v. Hefner et al

Filing 9

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 8 MOTION for Reconsideration re 6 Order of Dismissal pursuant to 28USC1915(e)(2)(B), 5 Memorandum & Order, filed by Plaintiff Shawn Yount. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of this action [Doc. #8] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal of this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/2/14. (CSG)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
SHAWN YOUNT,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
CARL HEFNER, et al.,
Defendants.

No. 1:14CV113 SNLJ

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the dismissal
of this matter. The Court has reviewed plaintiff’s arguments in support of his motion and finds
them without merit.
As the Court found in its August 21, 2014 Memorandum and Order supporting dismissal of
this matter, plaintiff’s action is subject to dismissal for multiple reasons. The foremost reason for
dismissal is that this action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Nothing in plaintiff’s motion
for reconsideration calls this finding into question. As such, plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration
of the dismissal of this case will be denied.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff=s motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of
this action [Doc. #8] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal of this dismissal would not be taken in good
faith.
Dated this 2nd day of October, 2014.

STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE