Jennings v. USA

Filing 2

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED.An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 10/6/2014. (JMC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
EUGENE JENNINGS,
Movant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 1:14CV00136 ERW

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on movant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct
sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Court will summarily dismiss the motion because it is
successive.
On July 30, 2007, after movant pled guilty to distributing cocaine base, the Court
sentenced movant to 151 months’ imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Movant
did not file an appeal. United States v. Jennings, 1:07CR10 ERW (E.D. Mo. 2007).
Movant filed his first motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 2255 on June 15, 2009.
Jennings v. United States, 1:09CV80 ERW (E.D. Mo. 2009). The motion was dismissed as timebarred, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied movant’s
application for a certificate of appealability on December 30, 2009. Jennings v. United States,
No. 09-2880 (8th Cir. 2009).
Movant filed a second motion to vacate on January 11, 2012. Jennings v. United States,
1:12CV08 ERW (E.D. Mo. 2012). It was dismissed as successive, and movant did not appeal
the dismissal. And movant filed a third motion to vacate August 23, 2013. Jennings v. United

States, 1:13CV122 ERW (E.D. Mo. 2013). It was also dismissed as successive, and movant did
not file an appeal.
Under § 2255(h), movant must receive authorization from the Court of Appeals before he
can file a successive motion to vacate in this Court. Because he has not received the necessary
authorization, the Court will dismiss this action without further proceedings.
Finally, movant has failed to demonstrate that jurists of reason would find it debatable
whether this action is successive. Thus, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c).
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED.
An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately.
So Ordered this 6th day of October, 2014.

E. RICHARD WEBBER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2