Simmons v. Dodson et al

Filing 67

OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to substitute parties [ECF No. 61] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Danny Dodson is DISMISSED from this action. An Order of Partial Dismissal will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/12/15. (MRS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION RICHARD L. SIMMONS, Plaintiff, v. DANNY DODSON, et al., Defendants, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:14CV167 ACL OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to substitute party. On May 5, 2015, defendant Janet Warren filed a suggestion of death concerning defendant Danny Dodson, who was formerly a medical officer for the Pemiscot County Jail (the “Jail”). Under Rule 25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff had ninety days to file an appropriate motion to substitute party. On July 20, 2015, plaintiff moved to substitute Thomas Greenwell, the Sheriff of Pemiscot County, for Dodson. Plaintiff contends, without any evidence or legal authority, that Greenwell is Dodson’s proper successor. Defendant argues that Greenwell is not the lawful successor under Missouri law because he has not been appointed as Dodson’s personal representative. The only connection between Dodson and Greenwell appears to be that Greenwell supervised the Jail, where Dodson worked. Greenwell is not an interested party, and substitution under Rule 25 is not proper. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to substitute parties [ECF No. 61] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Danny Dodson is DISMISSED from this action. An Order of Partial Dismissal will be filed separately. Dated this 12th day of August, 2015. HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?