Bice v. Cotner

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/26/2015. (JMC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION GARY BICE, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ANDREA BETH COTNER, Defendant, No. 1:15CV9 SNLJ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff=s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff, a prisoner, has filed at least three previous cases that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim.1 Under 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g), therefore, the Court may not grant the motion unless plaintiff “is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” After reviewing the complaint, the Court finds no allegations that would show that plaintiff is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. As a result, the Court will deny the motion and will dismiss this action without prejudice to refiling as a fully paid complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Dated this 26th day of January, 2015. STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Bice v Eastest, 1:13CV181 SNLJ (E.D. Mo.); Bice v. Comm’n or Directors of Cape Girardeau City Police Dep’t, 1:11CV27 SNLJ (E.D. Mo.); Bice v. Ester, 1:10CV93 SNLJ (E.D. Mo.).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?