Murphy v. Colvin

Filing 18

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 17 MOTION for Leave to File Response Regarding The Form of Plaintiff's Brief filed by Plaintiff Timmothy Murphy motion is DENIED as moot.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have 10 days, to and including March 7, 2016, to file a response to Defendants Statement of Additional Facts.( Response to Court due by 3/7/2016.). Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 2/26/16. (MRS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION TIMMOTHY MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:15-cv-131-AGF ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Response Regarding Form of Plaintiff’s Brief (Doc. No. 17). Plaintiff has asked the Court for leave to amend the statement of facts in his brief so as to comply with the Court’s previouslyentered Case Management Order. However, because Defendant has filed a Response to Plaintiff’s Facts in conjunction with her responsive brief, filed on January 14, 2016, that divides Plaintiff’s factual allegations into separate paragraphs and responds to them, the Court finds that no amendment of Plaintiff’s brief will be necessary. Instead, Plaintiff is directed to respond to Defendant’s Statement of Additional Facts and any additional facts asserted by Defendant in an appropriate format. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Response Regarding Form of Plaintiff’s Brief (Doc. No. 17) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have 10 days, to and including March 7, 2016, to file a response to Defendant’s Statement of Additional Facts. ` ____________________________________ AUDREY G. FLEISSIG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 26th day of February, 2016. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?