Moon v. Doerge et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 8 MOTION to Disqualify Judge filed by Plaintiff Darnell Wesly Moon motion is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/24/15. (MRS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
DARNELL WESLY MOON,
CHARLES H. DOERGE, V, et al.,
No. 1:15CV142 SNLJ
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff=s Amotion for recusal.@
Plaintiff asks the
Court to recuse itself from this matter because the Court has previously denied plaintiff=s
motions and dismissed his case. Plaintiff offers no other basis for showing that the Court has
failed to treat his cases with impartiality.
A judge Ashall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might
reasonably be questioned.@ 28 U.S.C. ' 455(a); Moran v. Clarke, 296 F.3d 638, 648 (8th Cir.
2002). When a judge Ahas a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge
of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding@ he must recuse himself. 28 U.S.C. '
455(b)(1). AThis restriction is intended to >promote public confidence in the integrity of the
judicial process.=@ Moran, 296 F.3d at 648 (quoting Liljeberg v. Health Servs. Acquisition Corp.,
486 U.S. 847, 859-60 (1988)). AWhether a judge actually has a bias, or actually knows of
grounds requiring recusal is irrelevantBsection 455(a) sets an objective standard that does not
require scienter.@ Id. (citations omitted). A[The issue is framed] as >whether the judge=s
impartiality might reasonably be questioned by the average person on the street who knows all
the relevant facts of a case.=@ Id. (quoting In re Kansas Pub. Employees Retirement Sys., 85 F.3d
1353, 1358 (8th Cir. 1996)). However, A>[a]n unfavorable judicial ruling . . . does not raise an
inference of bias or require the trial judge=s recusal.=@ Id. (quoting Harris v. Missouri, 960 F.2d
738, 740 (8th Cir.1992)).
AAbsent a factual showing of a reasonable basis for questioning his or her impartiality, or
allegations of facts establishing other disqualifying circumstances, a judge should participate in
cases assigned. Conclusory statements are of no effect. Nor are counsel=s unsupported beliefs and
assumptions. Frivolous and improperly based suggestions that a judge recuse should be firmly
declined.@ Maier v. Orr, 758 F.2d 1578, 1583 (9th Cir. 1985).
Plaintiff=s motion for recusal is frivolous. Plaintiff=s allegations regarding the Court=s bias
are conclusory and are not supported by any facts. As a result, the motion will be denied.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff=s Amotion for recusal@ [#8] is DENIED.
Dated this 24th
day of November, 2015.
STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?