Edington et al v. Social Security Administration

Filing 21

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen 20 is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sentence-four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 12/22/2016. (JMC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION KELLEY EDINGTON, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Cause No. 1:15 CV 206 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Kelley Edington’s appeal from an adverse ruling of the Social Security Administration. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen who filed her Report and Recommendation on December 1, 2016. Judge Cohen recommended that the Commissioner’s decision to deny benefits should be reversed and that this case should be remanded for further proceedings. Any objections to Judge Cohen’s Report and Recommendation had to be filed by December 15, 2013. Neither of the parties has filed an objection as of today’s date. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen [20] is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sentence-four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. _______________________________ RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 22nd day of December, 2016. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?