Isaac v. Flenoid

Filing 146

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 143 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on appeal under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Harold D. Isaac motion is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ECF No. 143] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $26.50 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United Stat es District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. (Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 12/3/2018.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/2/18. (CSG)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION HAROLD D. ISAAC, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. DANA COCKRELL and TIMOTHY HOLSTEN, Defendants. No. 1:16-CV-27-SNLJ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The motion is granted, and plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $26.50, which is twenty percent of his average monthly deposit. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ECF No. 143] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $26.50 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to “Clerk, United States District Court,” and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. Dated this 2nd day of November, 2018. STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?