Lee v. Hill et al

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 11 MOTION for Extension of: Time to Pay Filing Fee filed by Plaintiff Robert Lee motion is DENIED as moot. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for extension of time to pay thefiling fee (Docket No. 11) is DE NIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Corizon Medical Services is DISMISSED from this action.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Missouri Department of Corrections isDISMISSED from this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the official ca pacity claims against defendants Hill, Aufield, Randolph, Renshaw, Birch, Moeller, Gasaway, Babich, Wallace, Stange, Reed, and Beggs are DISMISSED.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the amended comp laint, pursuant to the service agreement the Court maintains with Corizon, as to defendants Hill, Aufield, Randolph, Renshaw, Birch, Moeller, Gasaway, and Babich in their individual capacities. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issueupon the amended complaint, pursuant to the service agreement the Court maintains with the Missouri Attorney General's Office, as to defendants Wallace, Stange, Reed, and Beggs in their individual capacities. IT IS FURTH ER ORDERED that, in their individual capacities, defendants Hill, Aufield, Randolph, Renshaw, Birch, Moeller, Gasaway, Babich, Wallace, Stange, Reed, andBeggs shall reply to the amended complaint within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni on 11/7/16. (MRS)

Download PDF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?