Banks v. USA

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..This matter is before me on movant's pro se motion for immediate release. Movant is represented by counsel. So, he does not have a right to appear before the Court pro se. E.g., United States v. Swinney, 970 F.2d 494, 498 (8th Cir. 1992). As a result, the motion is denied.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movants pro se motion for immediate release [ECF No. 10] is DENIED.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 10/12/16. (MRS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
GEORGE C. BANKS,
Movant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 1:16-CV-162 RWS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before me on movant’s pro se motion for immediate release.
Movant is represented by counsel. So, he does not have a right to appear before
the Court pro se. E.g., United States v. Swinney, 970 F.2d 494, 498 (8th Cir.
1992). As a result, the motion is denied.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant’s pro se motion for immediate
release [ECF No. 10] is DENIED.
Dated this 12th day of October, 2016.

RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE