Hemingway v. Reed et al
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $1.98 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motions to amend his complaint by interlineation [Doc. #8, #12, #13, #14, and #15] are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in this acti on within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff's action will be dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 12/2/16. (MRS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
LAMON TANEAL HEMINGWAY, SR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
PAULA REED, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:16CV220 SNLJ
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Plaintiff, a prisoner currently incarcerated at Southeast Correctional Center (“SECC”),
seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this civil action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
1983. Having reviewed plaintiff’s financial information, the Court assesses a partial initial filing
fee of $1.98, which is twenty percent of his average monthly deposit. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b).
Standard of Review
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is required to dismiss a complaint filed in forma
pauperis if it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
To state a claim for relief, a complaint must plead more than “legal conclusions” and
“[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action [that are] supported by mere
conclusory statements.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009).
A plaintiff must
demonstrate a plausible claim for relief, which is more than a “mere possibility of misconduct.”
Id. at 679. “A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows
the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct
alleged.” Id. at 678. Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for relief is a
context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and
common sense. Id. at 679.
When reviewing a complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court accepts the well-pled
facts as true. Furthermore, the Court liberally construes the allegations.
The Complaint
Plaintiff, who is currently incarcerated at SECC, brings this action against twenty-nine
defendants (29). Plaintiff’s complaint, with exhibits, makes up almost one-hundred (100) pages
of handwritten allegations. The complaint does not comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, which requires that the complaint contain “a short and plain statement of the
claim showing that [plaintiff] is entitled to relief.” The complaint is often vague, conclusory, and
repetitive. At times it refers to “defendants,” without specifying which defendant it is referring
to.
The gist of plaintiff’s assertions seem to be that he has been denied the right to file a
grievance and/or a grievance appeal on several different occasions while incarcerated at SECC.1
In addition to his original complaint, plaintiff has five motions to supplement and/or
amend his complaint, by either adding additional defendants, or removing defendants or adding
to the allegations in his complaint.
1
A grievance procedure does not confer any substantive constitutional right upon prison inmates.
See Bostic v. Babich, 2008 WL 906801 at *7 (E.D.Mo. Apr. 3, 2008). AIn the context of a state
prison system, an inmate grievance procedure is not constitutionally required.@ Spencer v.
Moore, 638 F. Supp. 315, 316 (E.D. Mo. 1986). AIf the state elects to provide a grievance
mechanism, violations of its procedures do not deprive prisoners of federal constitutional rights.
Therefore, a state=s failure to follow its grievance procedures does not give rise to a ' 1983
claim.@ Id. Additionally, a denial of a grievance, by itself, does not rise to a constitutional
violation. See George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 609 (7th Cir. 2007) (“Ruling against a prisoner on
an administrative complaint does not cause or contribute to the violation.”)
2
The Court does not accept amendments by interlineation or supplementation. See
Popoalii v. Correctional Medical Services, 512 F.3d 488, 497 (8th Cir.2008). Indeed, plaintiff’s
action, as it is currently outlined, appears to be legally frivolous. Nevertheless, because plaintiff
is proceeding pro se, the Court will allow plaintiff to file an amended complaint on a Court form.
Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint in
accordance with the specific instructions set forth herein.
All claims in an action must be included in one, centralized complaint form, as neither
the court nor defendants wish to search through supplemental and prior pleadings in order to
piece together plaintiff’s claims. Because plaintiff has named so many defendants, the Court will
require plaintiff to create a separate section in the amended complaint for each defendant. Each
defendant’s section shall contain all of the relevant facts and allegations pertaining to that
defendant, i.e., what alleged wrongs that defendant committed against plaintiff. The amended
complaint should not include any extraneous facts and should not contain legal arguments or
conclusions.
Plaintiff is warned that the filing of an amended complaint replaces the original
complaint and all previously-filed pleadings, and so he must include each and every one of
the claims he wishes to pursue in the amended complaint. See, e.g., In re Wireless Telephone
Federal Cost Recovery Fees Litigation, 396 F.3d 922, 928 (8th Cir. 2005). Any claims from
the original complaint, supplements, and/or pleadings that are not included in the amended
complaint will be deemed abandoned and will not be considered. Id. If plaintiff wishes to
sue defendants in their individual capacities, plaintiff must specifically say so in the
amended complaint. If plaintiff fails to sue defendants in their individual capacities, this
action may be subject to dismissal.
3
If plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint on a Court form within thirty days in
accordance with the Court’s instructions, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and
without further notice.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF
No. #2] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $1.98
within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance
payable to “Clerk, United States District Court,” and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his
prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original
proceeding.2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions to amend his complaint by
interlineation [Doc. #8, #12, #13, #14, and #15] are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in this
action within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a Prisoner Civil
Rights Complaint form.
2
Prisoners must pay the full amount of the $350 filing fee. After payment of the initial partial
filing fee, the prisoner is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding
month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. The agency having custody of the prisoner
will deduct the payments and forward them to the Court each time the amount in the account
exceeds $10. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Memorandum
and Order, plaintiff’s action will be dismissed, without prejudice.
Dated this 2nd day of December, 2016.
STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?