Lee v. Gullett et al

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $1.50 within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is f or an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's official-capacity claims are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to serve process on the complaint. Defendants Gullett, Manche, and Nicholson should be ser ved in accordance with the Court's agreement with Missouri. Defendant Gardner should be served in accordance with the Court's agreement with Corizon, Inc. ( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 8/24/2017.) Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 8/3/2017. (JMC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION DARRIN L. LEE, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS GULLETT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:17-CV-99 PLC MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff, a prisoner, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Having reviewed plaintiff’s financial information, the Court assesses a partial initial filing fee of $1.50, which is twenty percent of his average monthly deposit. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). Additionally, the Court will dismiss plaintiff’s official-capacity claims. Standard of Review Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is required to dismiss a complaint filed in forma pauperis if it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. To state a claim for relief, a complaint must plead more than “legal conclusions” and “[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action [that are] supported by mere conclusory statements.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). A plaintiff must demonstrate a plausible claim for relief, which is more than a “mere possibility of misconduct.” Id. at 679. “A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id. at 678. Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for relief is a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense. Id. at 679. When reviewing a complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court accepts the well-pled facts as true. Furthermore, the Court liberally construes the allegations. The Complaint Plaintiff is incarcerated in the Southeast Correctional Center. He alleges that defendants Thomas Gullett and Tyson Manche, who are both correctional officers, beat him and pepper sprayed him while he was handcuffed. He says defendant Kristen Gardner, who is a nurse, refused to treat his injuries. He later found out he had a torn retina, among other things. And he claims that defendant James Nicholson, who is an investigator, wrote a false report to the county prosecutor to have charges brought against him. Discussion Plaintiff’s individual-capacity claims against the defendants are not frivolous. As a result, the Court will order the Clerk to serve process on the complaint. Naming a government official in his or her official capacity is the equivalent of naming the government entity that employs the official, in this case the State of Missouri. Will v. Michigan Dep=t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989). “[N]either a State nor its officials acting in their official capacity are ‘persons’ under § 1983.” Id. As a result, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against defendants in their official capacities. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is GRANTED. 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $1.50 within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to “Clerk, United States District Court,” and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding.1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s official-capacity claims are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to serve process on the complaint. Defendants Gullett, Manche, and Nicholson should be served in accordance with the Court’s agreement with Missouri. Defendant Gardner should be served in accordance with the Court’s agreement with Corizon, Inc. Dated this 3rd day of August, 2017. CATHERINE D. PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Prisoners must pay the full amount of the $350 filing fee. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. The agency having custody of the prisoner will deduct the payments and forward them to the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?