Smith v. Holder et al

Filing 49

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Smith's motion for appointment of counsel, [Doc. No. 44], motion for exemption from certificate of service requirements, [Doc. No. 45], motion for leave to file in excess of the page limitation, [ Doc. No. 47], and motion for leave to file a reply brief out of time, [Doc. No. 46], are DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Smith must submit all filings through his counsel. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 12/12/2017. (cc: Christopher Smith)(JMC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER GERALD SMITH,
Plaintiff,
v.
BOB HOLDER, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 1:17 CV 117 RWS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Plaintiff Christopher Smith files pro se motions for appointment of counsel, [Doc. No.
44], for exemption from certificate of service requirements, [Doc. No. 45], for leave to file a
reply brief out of time [Doc. No. 46], and for leave to file in excess of the page limitation [Doc.
No. 47]. I have already granted Smith’s prior motion for appointment of counsel. [Doc. No. 40.]
Because Smith is now prosecuting his claim with the assistance of appointed counsel, his filings
must be made by his attorney through the Court’s electronic case filing system.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Smith’s motion for appointment of counsel, [Doc. No.
44], motion for exemption from certificate of service requirements, [Doc. No. 45], motion for
leave to file in excess of the page limitation, [Doc. No. 47], and motion for leave to file a reply
brief out of time, [Doc. No. 46], are DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Smith must submit all filings through his counsel.

RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 12th day of December, 2017.